Structural Tensions: Decentralization Versus Sovereignty
Bitcoin challenges fundamental pillars of the modern state:
The monopoly on monetary issuance is replaced by a fixed-supply system, without central intervention.
The capacity to censor transactions disappears in an environment without intermediaries.
Fiscal control is limited by the pseudonymous and global nature of the network.
This generates a dilemma: states can reject Bitcoin, but in doing so they stimulate its informal adoption; or they can integrate it partially, at the cost of renouncing certain structural controls.
In BSV, these tensions are resolved with a focus on unlimited scalability, allowing accessible digital sovereignty for all.
Last updated
Was this helpful?